Stem cells as a potential therapy for Diabetes, Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's and many more - Ever since birth of the Dolly (1996) 1, this line has became a hope for millions of victims of these high-burden diseases. However, stem cell research is often surrounded in ethical controversy which hindered its applied research to target potentially curable diseases. With the recent advancement in stem cell science and reprogramming the adult cell, scientists are now more optimistic than ever before to translate stem cell research on the clinical desk. Here is the remaining story of stop press article, posted on June 8.
Mature somatic unipotent adult cell can be reprogrammed to pluripotent form, known as induced Pluripotent Cell (iPS). Currently used methods, somatic cell nucleus transfer (SCNT, i.e.: Dolly) and cell fusion to cultivate embryonic stem cells (ESC) and cloning purpose are surrounded by ethical issues. Stem cells (i.e. blood stem cell) currently produced using SCNT (for autologus cell transplants and other therapies) lack long-term self-renewal capacity. Also, use of ESC poses increase chances of immune rejection compare to using patient's own adult cells. Overriding these hurdles, scientists are now exploring possible indirect ways to reprogram the adult cell back to embryonic state by manipulating signal pathways and genes related to cell differentiation using epigenetic reprogramming. Experimental animal studies in mouse revealed several critical genes related to pluripotency power of ESC, namely OCT3/4 (Pou5f1), SOX2, c-Myc and KLF4. 2 These four transcription factors are involved in maintaining pluripotency (self-renewal) and upon subsequent cell differentiation of (fertilized) ESC, these factors are found to be silent by mechanisms yet to be identified.
The first generation of iPS was produced from mouse fibroblasts in 2006 by Takahashi and Yamanaka 3 using retroviral mediated transduction of these four factors and then selecting resulting cells expressing specific marker protein coded by Fbx15 2 thought to be marker of ESC pluripotency. This procedure did not require use of ESC at all for production of iPS cells (given name, Fbx15 iPS cells) which are similar to ESC in morphology, proliferation and teratoma (differentiation property) formation. However, subsequent gene expression and DNA methylation patterns of Fbx15 iPS cells were different from ESC and they fail to produce viable chimeras (offspring) indicating alternative pathways linked with cell differentiation or selecting incorrect marker of expression. i.e. Fbx15 in this case.
Within six months (in June 2007), same group published a breakthrough study along with two other independent research groups making successful reprogramming of mouse fibroblasts into iPS and even producing viable chimera. Maherali's team also documented reactivation of somatically silenced X chromosome in female iPS using same reprogramming method. 4,5,6 This time, they used different selection marker, Nanog (from 'Tir Na Nog, the mythological Celtic land of the ever young) instead of Fbx15. Second generation of iPS is emerged as outcomes of all studies showed successful conversion of mouse fibroblast in iPS (now, named Nanog iPS cells) which are more similar to ESC in terms of gene expression, DNA methylation patterns and producing viable chimeras (and thereby contributing to subsequent germ-line production) indicating Nanog is a major determinant of cellular pluripotency. However, researchers also showed following hurdles before effective iPS can be substituted for ESC.
1. Nanog iPS cells have strong silencing of retrovirally expressed OCT3/4 (Pou5f1), SOX2, c-Myc and KLF4 c-Myc, indicating they are only required for the induction, but not the maintenance of pluripotency (pluripotency is then maintained by endogenous activated Oct3/4 and other genes in Nanog iPS cells). Yamanaka's team reported tumor development in approx. 20% of viable offspring which was attributable to reactivation of c-Myc through retrovirus activity. Since these factors are only required for induction of iPS synthesis, research is now focusing on using transient expression methods (i.e. using host-friendly Adeno-Associated Virus delivery of genes) rather retroviral induction of transcription factors.
2. Efficiency of Nanog cell induction is just 0.1% which points towards additional genes and epigenetic events required for successful formation of iPS.
--
Although not precisely labeled as third generation of iPS, recently published paper documenting first ever successful parthenogenetic (meaning reproduction without sexual act or need of mating partner) activation of human oocytes and production of parthenogenetic human ESC (phESC) may be an another method to produce MHC matching cells for patient-specific cell-based therapy and minimizing immune rejection problem associated with ESC or SCNT. 7 Parthenogenetic stem cells are produced from unfertilized oocytes and contain genetic material 'exclusively' from the oocyte donor (the potential patient). Further research analysis is ongoing till this simple approach (in terms of procedure and equipment wise) may open new doors in treating degenerative diseases.
 |  |
Related posts on Reprogramming the Cell1.
Part 1: Basics of Stem Cell2.
Part 2: Road to a unipotent adult cell (Programming Cell)3.
Part 3: Stop pressReferences:1. Wilmut I, et. al. | Sheep cloned by nuclear transfer from a cultured cell line |
Nature 1996;380:64-6 | PMID:
85989062. NCBI OMIM database:
Oct3/4 (Pou5f1) |
SOX2 |
c-Myc |
KLF4 |
Fbx15 |
Nanog3. Takahashi, K. & Yamanaka, S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors.
Cell 2006;126:663–676 | PMID:
171540614. Yamanaka S, et. al. | Generation of germline-competent induced pluripotent stem cells |
Nature 2007;448:313-7 | PMID:
175543385. Wernig M, et. al. | In vitro reprogramming of fibroblasts into a pluripotent ES-cell-like state |
Nature 2007;448:318-24 | PMID:
175543366. Maherali N, et. al. | Directly reprogrammed fibroblasts show global epigenetic remodeling and widespread tissue contribution |
Cell Stem Cell 2007;1:55–707. Revazova ES, et. al. | Patient-Specific Stem Cell Lines Derived from Human Parthenogenetic Blastocysts | Cloning Stem Cells. 2007 Jun 26; [Epub ahead of print] | PMID:
17594198 | Crossref.:
Activated eggs offer route to stem cells- News@Nature
#end